Send Letter eng
War and justice

60 Russian war criminals convicted in Ukraine over a year – infographic

The convicts received sentences ranging from 9 years to life imprisonment.

Between January 1 and December 23, 2024, Ukrainian courts handed down 41 verdicts under Article 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine: violation of the laws and customs of war. Forty of these sentences were passed in absentia, meaning that the cases were considered without the defendants being present in the dock. The Media Initiative for Human Rights obtained this information after analyzing the Unified State Register of Court Decisions.

Currently, Article 438 of the Criminal Code is the main article under which war crimes cases are considered in Ukraine. It provides for criminal liability, in particular, for ill-treatment of prisoners of war or civilians, looting of national property in the occupied territories, and the use of means of warfare prohibited by international law. 

In 2024, Ukraine convicted 66 people for such crimes, 60 of whom were Russian citizens and 6 were Ukrainians. Among the Ukrainians are, for example, an adviser to the so-called “head of the DPR” who abducted civilians, a judge from Crimea who decided to expel Ukrainians from the peninsula, and a resident of the Kherson region who helped Russians detain and torture people during the occupation. For what the Russian military was tried, read here, here, and here.  

In 2024, the courts of the Chernihiv region became the record holders regarding the number of sentences under Art 438 of the CCU. There were 14 verdicts handed down there during the year. Nine verdicts were handed down by the courts of Kyiv and the Kyiv region, five by Kharkiv, four by Odesa, and three by Sumy. Two verdicts were handed down in the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, and one was each in the Dnipropetrovs’k and Mykolaiv regions. Only eight of these verdicts were appealed to the courts of appeal but remained unchanged. 

Most of the Russians accused of war crimes remain at large. However, witnesses and victims are willing to testify against them. In such cases, the court has the right to apply a special in absentia procedure for considering the case — that is, in the absence of the accused. You can learn more about this procedure and its issues on our YouTube channel.   

In cases of war crimes trials in absentia, Ukraine could count on Interpol member states to detain and extradite citizens convicted of war crimes to serve their sentences. However, this is not happening. MIHR journalists explain why in their investigation

Earlier, the MIHR described in detail what is happening in war-related court cases in the interim analysis for 2023. The analysis highlighted several problems that arise during the consideration of such cases. Read the analysis here.

This publication was compiled with the support of the International RenaissanceFoundation. It’s content is the exclusive responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of the International Renaissance Foundation.

0 Comments

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Mandatory fields are marked *

Similar posts
War and justice
One Conviction for Every Thousand Russian War Crimes: Ukrainian Justice Fails to Keep Up with Reality

In the three years since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Ukrainian law enforcement has documented over 150,000 war crimes. These crimes occurred wherever the Russian military has set foot. The staggering scale suggests Russia’s coordinated intent and policy aimed at the destruction of Ukraine as a nation. Yet the national justice system paints a different picture. Ukrainian courts have not been able to reflect the true scope of Russia’s crimes against the Ukrainian people. Anna Rassamakhina, MIHR’s expert in international humanitarian law, explains what needs to be done to straighten things out.

3 April 2025

Advocacy
For the First Time since Nuremberg: Strasbourg Takes a Step towards a Tribunal for Russia for the Crime of Aggression

In Strasbourg, the members of the Coalition of States held a final meeting to finalize the technical work on the draft documents necessary to establish a special tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine.

25 March 2025

War and justice
From hero to traitor: former intelligence officer Eduard Shevchenko on trial in Mykolaiv

Eduard Shevchenko, a former commander of the 73rd Naval Special Operations Center and a former official of the Ochakiv City Council, is now on trial in Mykolaiv. According to the investigation, Shevchenko, who had fought in intense battles while serving in the ATO zone, betrayed his oath and began working for the Russians after their full-scale invasion. Allegedly, under their orders he attempted to recruit the mayor of Ochakiv and reported on the aftermath of shelling.

4 March 2025

More articles
Our social media
Relevant publications
More articles
Prisoners of war
94% of Ukrainian Prisoners of War Convicted in Russia Are Accused of Terrorism

Monitoring of unlawful court cases against Ukrainian prisoners of war, conducted by the Media Initiative for Human Rights (MIHR), shows that courts in the occupied territories mostly convict POWs for "murders," while courts in Russia hand down verdicts based on "terrorism" charges.

23 April 2025

Prisoners of war
Three Sleepless Years, Cancer and Despair: Families of Captive Marines Speak of “Dual Torture”

Around 1,300 Ukrainian marines remain in Russian captivity. For the past three years, their families have been fighting to bring them home. But alongside this uphill battle is another, quieter war – the fight to preserve their health. Families describe their experience as a form of dual torture: while the marines endure physical and psychological abuse in Russian prisons, the pain and suffering reverberate back home.

16 April 2025

Advocacy
Discussion on Russian Reparations for Missing Persons in Ukraine held in The Hague. Here are the four key points

Reparations represent a state’s commitment to compensate for harm or loss inflicted by its breach of international law. They are a vital component of restoring justice for victims of armed conflicts and serve as a safeguard against the recurrence of crimes in the future. These issues were the focus of the expert discussion in The Hague, which addressed legal and institutional responses to securing reparations for missing persons in Ukraine.

10 April 2025

More articles