Send Letter eng
War and justice

“No one was running away.” Former head of Kharkiv Security Service says he is suing SBI, SSU, and the Prosecutor General’s Office

Roman Dudin, the former head of the Kharkiv Security Service, is accused of high treason — allegedly because of him, the local Security Service failed to act properly at the beginning of the Russian invasion. One of the reasons is that Dudin allegedly left his place of service without permission and fled Kharkiv. He is now suing the SBI, the SSU, and the Prosecutor General’s Office for disseminating this information. On August 21, the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv failed to hold the first hearing on the case’s merits. The prosecutor was supposed to announce the indictment, and the court was supposed to decide on the procedure for considering the case and examining the evidence. Instead, the panel’s presiding judge, Volodymyr Buhil, recused himself because his security clearance had expired three days before the hearing.

After the meeting, Dudin told reporters that on August 18, he had filed five civil lawsuits for 380 million hryvnias against law enforcement agencies.

— 100 million for each service — the State Bureau of Investigation, the Prosecutor General’s Office, and the SSU. And 40 million each against a group of prosecutors and investigators. At their press conferences, they said that on the 24th of February, I ran away to my mother in Volyn. Everyone understands that no one fled anywhere. I was in Kyiv. I received an order from the head of the Security Service of Ukraine (Ivan Bakanov at the time — MIHR) to move to Kyiv with the Alpha group. As a soldier, I fulfilled this order,” Dudin said.

Roman Dudin in the courtroom. Photo: MIHR

He claims that on February 25, he received an order and left from Kharkiv to Kyiv, where he took up positions at 33 Volodymyrska Street and spent two days clearing the government quarter and detaining suspicious people. He says the main task was to hold the government buildings: The Verkhovna Rada, the Cabinet of Ministers, Bankova Street, where the President’s Office, the Interior Ministry, and the Security Service of Ukraine are located: “If the government buildings are not captured, the country is not considered defeated.” Dudin claims that he then returned to Kharkiv with a group of special forces and weapons.

According to the investigation, Dudin was aware of the Russian invasion on February 24, 2022, but acted to the detriment of the state’s defense and security. He allegedly did not doubt Russia’s offensive’s success and counted on the occupiers’ good attitude. He organized attempts to seize power in the region, remove the head of the Kharkiv Regional Military Administration, and discredited the authorities through false information to the media. Also, under his leadership, the Kharkiv Security Service allegedly failed to fulfill its tasks, while Dudin ordered his subordinates to leave Kharkiv and leave the place of service himself.

Last year, on May 29, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy fired Dudin because he “did not work to protect the city from the first days of the full-scale war, but thought only about himself.”

Roman Dudin’s group of lawyers. Their client is behind them. Photo: MIHR

Dudin has been in pre-trial detention for almost a year. He pleads not guilty and claims that he has documents that refute entirely the prosecution’s case. He is “probably the only one who did something to prevent the Kharkiv region from being surrendered.”

In July 2023, the prosecutor’s office sent an indictment to court. Because the courts of Kharkiv and the region do not have a special permit for activities related to state secrets, Dudin’s case was transferred to Kyiv. After Judge Bugil’s recusal, a new panel of the Shevchenkivsky District Court will be formed to consider the case and determine whether the hearings will be closed.

Yuriy Glotov, one of the defendant’s lawyers, says that the defense will insist on an open hearing of the case and will only hold closed hearings of the parts containing state secrets — one volume of the case is marked “Top Secret.”

If Dudin’s guilt is proven, he faces 15 years or life in prison.

Iryna Domashchenko, MIHR journalist 


0 Comments

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Mandatory fields are marked *

Similar posts
War and justice
We call on the Verkhovna Rada not to adopt draft law № 7033-d, which limits access to court decisions

On May 2, 2024, the Parliamentary Legal Committee reviewed and endorsed draft law No. 7033-д for parliamentary consideration. This draft law limits access to information and decisions within the register of court decisions, which hold substantial public interest and are crucial for public oversight of law enforcement activities. The proposed changes undermine the principles of a democratic society and contradict Ukraine’s commitments to European integration.

16 May 2024

War and justice
Genocide in Srebrenica: History Lessons for Ukraine

On 11 July 1995, over eight thousand Bosnian Muslims — men and boys — were captured and killed by the forces and police of Bosnian Serbs near the town of Srebrenica. The planned and organized massacre of people on religious and ethnic grounds is still considered the largest in Europe since World War II.

30 April 2024

Analytics
Despair or search for justice: why victims of war crimes participate in court hearings

On March 20, the MIHR presented an analytical study on victims' legal status, experience, and motivation in war crimes cases. This is the first such study in Ukraine. The research consists of a theoretical part about the experience of other countries in working with victims of war crimes, an analysis of national legislation, and a practical part where the team summarizes the experience of victims whose cases are already in courts or under active investigation. 

20 March 2024

More articles
Our social media
Relevant publications
More articles
War and justice
We call on the Verkhovna Rada not to adopt draft law № 7033-d, which limits access to court decisions

On May 2, 2024, the Parliamentary Legal Committee reviewed and endorsed draft law No. 7033-д for parliamentary consideration. This draft law limits access to information and decisions within the register of court decisions, which hold substantial public interest and are crucial for public oversight of law enforcement activities. The proposed changes undermine the principles of a democratic society and contradict Ukraine’s commitments to European integration.

16 May 2024

Advocacy
38 thousand missing Ukrainians: how to find and identify people

More than fifty diplomats took part in a special OSCE event, where the Media Initiative for Human Rights, for the first time since the beginning of Russia's war against Ukraine, raised the issue of missing Ukrainians. Apart from the MIHR and delegations of OSCE participating states, the discussion was attended by relatives of missing persons, the Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War, and the International Commission on Missing Persons.

16 May 2024

Prisoners of war
57th Brigade Soldiers Missing in Action: Heavy Combat, Death, Captivity, and the Search

On the very first day of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the entire territory of the Luhansk region became a battlefield. At that time, the soldiers of the 57th Separate Motorized Infantry Brigade, named after the Kish Otaman Kost Hordiienko, were stationed in the area of Triokhizbenka. A significant number of the brigade's soldiers were captured during that period, and most of them are still held by the Russians, with some considered missing in action. Since then, many families of the 57th Brigade soldiers have been struggling to find and bring back their loved ones. On the second anniversary of the fierce battles for the towns of Novotoshkivka and Toshkivka in Luhansk, MIHR tells the stories of several soldiers of this brigade who are missing in action.

10 May 2024

More articles