Send Letter eng
War and justice

Pskov paratrooper Andriy Medvedev has managed to have his case considered by a panel of judges

In Irpin, it is the second time that the court was not able to hold the preparatory session on the case of the Russian military accused of a war crime. Why did it happen, tells the MIHR journalist who attended the court.

On May 15, the Irpin City Court of Kyiv Region adjourned the preparatory session on the case of Pskov paratrooper Andriy Medvedev for the second time. He is accused of a war crime committed in Irpin in March of 2022. The investigation says that the Russian, jointly with other RF military, bullied civilians: beating them and imitating the execution of three locals by shooting.

At the beginning of the session, Medvedev asked the court for the journalists not to take pictures of him. The court allowed the mass media to take pictures of the adjudicatory process and its participants, except for Medvedev, “because of the defendant’s personal objections.”

Andriy Medvedev is led into the courtroom. Photo by MIHR

Then it turned out that all the three complainants did not come to court.  Two had been absent from the previous session. This time they all had been duly notified, and one of them had sent an application to try in his absence.  Given the circumstances, the parties did not object to starting the trial proceedings.

At the same time, Judge Natalia Karabaza explained to Medvedev that he has the right to examination of the case by several judges. It is provided by the Criminal Procedural Code, according to which a defendant may apply for consideration of the case by a panel of three judges if the article under which he is judged envisages punishment of more than ten years in prison.

The Russian military is accused under Article 438, Part 1, “Violation of the Laws or Customs of War” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. That is an especially grave crime. If proven guilty, the man faces 8 to 12 years of imprisonment. Therefore, Medvedev exercised his right to collegial consideration of the case by filing the relevant petition. Kyrylo Shurkhno, the defendant’s lawyer from the Center for Free Legal Aid, supported the defendant, stating that Medvedev’s position had been coordinated with him as a defender

The court granted the petition, once again postponing the preparatory session. It means that the proceedings on charges against Medvedev will be transferred to the office of the court, where the auto-distribution system will determine among the judges of Irpin Court the composition of the board that will consider the case of Pskov paratrooper. After that, there will be a third attempt to hold the preparatory session.

 

Iryna Domashchenko, Journalist, MIHR

Translated from Ukrainian by Olena Balatska

0 Comments

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Mandatory fields are marked *

Similar posts
War and justice
A Ukrainian Court Sentenced Dubinskyi, Responsible for Downing the Malaysian Boeing, on Charges of Terrorism Rather Than a War Crime

In Ukraine, Dubinskyi was not convicted for directly downing the plane but for waging aggressive war and participating in the ‘DNR’ terrorist organization. Experts emphasize that this is a misclassification. You can find out why this is important and how this verdict differs from that of The District Court of The Hague in the MIHR analysis.

10 September 2024

War and justice
“I do not identify with the defendant — I am here to ensure the balance of justice and fairness”, — the lawyer of the Russian military

Yuliia Shuliak is a Ukrainian lawyer who represents Russian military personnel accused of war crimes in court. In an interview with MIHR, the lawyer talks about her experience working on war crimes cases, the challenges of the trial in absentia, the impact of an international educational project on her perception of her work, and the public condemnation.

19 July 2024

War and justice
Without Lawyers and Witnesses: How Russia Ignores the Rights of Imprisoned Ukrainians to a Fair Trial and What This Means for the Aggressor Country

The MIHR asked Maksym Tymochko, an officer of the International Law Department of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, why Russia ignores the immunity of a combatant, how the case against Nazi lawyers in Germany will help Ukraine, and why the enemy changed its strategy in its trials of the Azov fighters.

24 June 2024

More articles
Our social media
Relevant publications
More articles
Advocacy
“Torture and persecution of Ukrainians by Russia should be investigated as crimes against humanity” — human rights activists

In Warsaw, MIHR, Zmina, and OMCT presented a large-scale study of Russia's crimes in the occupied territories of Ukraine. It is about the torture and persecution of Ukrainians on political and ideological grounds. During the discussion, they also talked about the medical and legal documentation of torture, with PHR sharing its experience.

8 October 2024

Advocacy
Russia must be brought to accountability for crimes against humanity: a new investigation was presented in Warsaw

During the annual OSCE human rights conference in the Polish capital, MIHR presented a large-scale investigation into how Russia persecutes Ukrainians. This is its second part. It not only describes in detail the crimes committed by the Russian military in Kyiv, Chernihiv, and Sumy regions but also records the places where Ukrainians are held, the ways they are taken to Russia, and the names and military units involved in these crimes.

3 October 2024

Advocacy
“We need a hybrid court that will prosecute Russians. Without this, there will be no effective justice”, — a new tribunal was called for at the OSCE Human Dimension Conference

Today, within the OSCE Annual Human Dimension Conference framework, the Ukraine 5 AM Coalition organized a public discussion ”In Search of Justice. What should the architecture of justice in Ukraine look like based on the experience of victims and the needs of the justice system.”

2 October 2024

More articles